Convenience Meets Dangerous Reliance: “Self-Driving” Cars and Crashes
With an increase in vehicles hitting the market with driver assist and what has been called “self-driving technology,” it is important for drivers to understand what these terms mean, and how to correct the common misconceptions regarding the level of capabilities these cars possess. These vehicles, and the majority of technology in the consumer market up to this point, only serves to assist drivers, and are not designed to be left unattended to allow the car to drive itself. So the surge in crashes can be linked to drivers overestimating the cars ability to drive and function without their full attention dedicated to the road. Some insight to this has been found in data compiled by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
Car Crash Data on Self-Driving Vehicles
The NHTSA complied nine months of crash data, breaking the data into two categories based on the level of the autonomous systems. The first are driver-assist systems. These are systems that offer speed and steering input, but cannot drive without the driver operating the vehicle normally. These systems are designed to help correct mistakes to reduce crashes and human error. The NHTSA found that there have been 367 car crashes involving these vehicles in the nine month span, and within this number there were six fatalities and five serious injuries. Of the 367 crashes, 74% involved a Tesla system, either its "full self-driving" software or its precursor, Tesla Autopilot.
The second classification includes vehicles that are fully autonomous technologies. These are vehicles that are intended to be able to function without any necessary human interaction behind the wheel. There were 130 crashes involving fully automated driving systems, roughly 50% of which were attributable to Waymo crashes, 26% to Transdev, a shuttle operator, and Cruise, which offers robotaxis for General Motors in San Francisco, responsible for 18%.
Although there are reports of crashes with both types of automated systems, there is a lot of potential for these technologies, if used correctly, to greatly reduce crash frequency, and crash severity. The NHTSA’s information on these systems shows that with driver assist in the areas of forward collision warnings, lane departure warnings, rear cross traffic warnings, and blind sport warnings, drivers will soon be safer than ever on the road. This potential safety however, is contingent on consumers understanding the capabilities and limitations of the technology.
Driver Assist Technology Can be Problematic
Even with driver vigilance behind the wheel, these driver-assist systems, much like all forms of technology, are capable of error. Earlier this year Tesla was ordered by a court in Munich, Germany to pay over $101,000 in damages after a woman claimed that her Model X's Autopilot feature failed to recognize hazards and braked unexpectedly when navigating through city traffic.
If you or a loved one has sustained a serious injury in a car accident involving a self-driving vehicle, an experienced personal injury attorney can help. It is important to consult with a lawyer early to investigate your options, and preserve crucial evidence. For assistance with these matters, please contact us to learn more.
Contact Us for a Free Consultation
About the author: Peter J. Gregory is a partner with MCCM Personal Injury Lawyers in Rochester NY. He is a trial lawyer with extensive experience resolving disputes in state and federal trial courts. As a personal injury lawyer, Gregory focuses on advising clients who have been injured or lost loved ones in accidents caused by the carelessness or recklessness of others. Please feel free to contact him directly at firstname.lastname@example.org or (585) 512-3506.
This publication is intended as an information source for clients, prospective clients, and colleagues and constitutes attorney advertising. The content should not be considered legal advice and readers should not act upon information in this publication without individualized professional counsel.
McConville Considine Cooman & Morin, P.C. is a full-service law firm based in Rochester, New York, providing high-quality legal services to businesses and individuals since 1979. With over a dozen attorneys and a full paralegal support staff, the firm is well-positioned to right-size services tailored to each client. We are large enough to provide expertise in a broad range of practice areas, yet small enough to devote prompt, personal attention to our clients.
We represent a diverse range of clients located throughout New York State and New England. They include individuals, numerous manufacturing and service industry businesses, local governments, and health care professionals, provider groups, facilities and associations. We also serve as local counsel to out-of-state clients and their attorneys who have litigation pending in Western New York courts. For more information, please contact us at 585.546.2500.